A number of philosphers such as Henri Bergson, Gilles Delueuze, Manual De Landa and Sanford Kwinter have all argued that time is one of the most important aspects of our physical environment because with time comes change and novelty.

Physics has long held a different view, one that has further cemented under Einstein's special relativity that introduced the concept that space and time were part of the same surface.

However the physicists in the this article are arguing that time is in fact a "numerical order of material change" which is much more in line with the idea of becoming that the philosophers above value so highly. It is a perspective that is more useful for architectural thought, which is so caught up with the changes in the physical environment such as weather, material degradation and more ethereal changes like development of neighboring areas.

This still leaves out many of the more productive ideas around becoming, ideas less tied to the actual physical and more to the virtual and qualitative.

La Coruña Center For The Arts by aceboXalonso studio can be unbearably stark at times, it is also an exquisite and beautiful space. The filmy light through double curtain wall into the crisp concrete interiors creates an airy but moody and layered space that is overpowering in its emptiness. It is a building that I find hard to love, but I suspect it will haunt my dreams for years to come with its potential. Sometimes, the best buildings are like that.

As always, articles on the practice of web design are so applicable to Architects. Though some of the advice is the norm in architectural practice, there is still much to learn from this article.

Lebbeus Woods comments on Sarah Williams Goldhagen's article in the New York Times about the idea that there is a current trend in Architecture that is trying to embody nature. Her main example regards tree metaphors.

While Goldhagen's article seems to be largely concerned with a neo-phenomenology of embodied nature, Lebbeus' commentary brings up an excellent point about how this trend is hardly new, though it tends to come and go. His examples are from the turn of the 20th century movements of Expressionism and its attempt to evoke nature, though as Lebbeus points out their concerns mostly focused on geological ideas.

It seems to me that many of that much of contemporary architectural thought is largely re-hatching the architectural equivalent of abstract expressionism. Much like the the painters of the mid 20th century did in response to expressionism of the early part of the century, many contemporary architects are trying to dissolve the figure of the building in favor of an abstract ideal of affectation, which acts as a substitute for evoking nature directly.

While Goldhagen may have a point that some may easily be interpreted as direct metaphors of natural phenomena, much of the architectural discourse is around such ideas as qualitative performance, biomimetics and parametric variation, which are all ways of abstracting away the direct metaphorical content of natural phenomenon and dealing with the ideas behind them. Though with the contemporary tools at our disposal, such abstraction is perhaps more potent that true imitation, it is unlikely that one can claim that any building can live up to Goldhagen's need for a phenomenological connection to nature and it is worth remembering Lebbeus's admonishment that architectural form is limited in ability to address such need in its entirety.

An interesting video showing how glass manufacturer, Corning Glass, envisions how glass will be used in technology in the near future. The gist involves a lot of ubiquitous glass display and touch control surfaces.

Great read on the importance of API's for better leveraging information to meet ones business goals.

Beyond that, API's hold a lot of interesting concepts and lessons for Architectural practice. An API is a way of abstracting the interface between different programs. It speaks to a modular and distinct information architechure that none the less behaves as if it is continuous. Too often in Architectural thought, buildings are conceived of as either totally discrete objects or as a singular vision to be propagated across all Architecture in a continuous field. It can be difficult to think of buildings as discrete fields of program that none the less need to interface with the larger context around it in a seamless way while retaining their own identities.

Like a huge net, this neutrino detector will be built on the floor of the sea and will cover an area of several cubic kilometers. The structure will consist of long cables anchored to the sea floor with large glass spheres brimming with sensors attached to them. While consisting mostly of empty space, the really interesting thing is that because the structure lives on the bottom of the sea floor, it will be totally inaccessible to humans. Architects rarely think of what an architecture might be without humans and the few that do tend to think in a purely formal or virtual sense, creating buildings with very little in the way of program or function. Yet clearly there are programs that lack any human interaction and exists in a very actual sense, rather than virtually.

The apparent incongruity of our 3 dimensional space and the theoretically predicted 9 dimensional space of super-string theory has fascinated me for years.

The proposed idea is that the other 6 dimensions are still wrapped up and very small, so only the 3 we currently live in are experienced. In many ways, this parallels our built environment where we only perceive the usual 3 dimensions, however every space is filled with all sorts of other dimensional data, from the mundane aspects like program, circulation, and temperature to the more ephemeral aspects like the space of a conversation.

The real trick is visualizing all these additional dimensions in a way that is not purely reductive. I have no answers, but it is a problem I will be trying to tackle for years to come. Suggestions are certainly welcome.

While a very cool idea, don't let this make you think that your clothes will replace your smartphone one day. Do you really want to wear the same shirt every day or deal with the complexities of transferring your data securely to each day's clothes?

The real use of this type of technology will be adding another level of perception and connectivity to your day to day lives. As the article points out, adding sensors that detect radiation or monitor your vital signs are a possibility. But what about a tee-shirt that understands your movements and gestures and can use them as input into other devices. Or perhaps it could dynamically display information when viewed through a reality overlay system, be they glasses, contact lenses, or just your smartphone screen. By embedding information and computation directly into our clothes they become even more an extension of ourselves.

It is fascinating how a simple act on mundane objects can create something amazing. These landscapes carved out of books have a strange intimacy while remaining mysterious. This duality makes all the difference.

Originally via materialicious.
http://www.materialicious.com/2011/12/book-carving-landscapes-by-guy-laramee.html

I am sure many of you have already seen this, but I wanted to talk about it anyway. Dynamo provides a graphical way for linking and driving parametric models in Revit. While there are similar tools such a Grasshopper for Rhino, Dynamo's real promise is bringing a graphical programming environment to a production powerhouse like Revit. I look forward to seeing how it develops.

A really excellent presentation from AU2011 by Jason Grant and David Light on how to leverage Revit for producing great graphics. Much of their advice is straightforward and many people will know pieces of it, but I doubt very many have been as systematic about it as what is shown in the presentation. Like most software for producing architectural graphics, much of the advice revolves around developing a consistent process that can be integrated with the day to day workflow and the curation of Revit families for all those little elements of presentation, like people, analysis lines
+ arrows and site elements. Anything to give life and depth without cluttering the graphic is useful.

The vacuum of space isn't empty. It is filled with a constant hum of virtual particles being created and destroyed. It turns out that a couple of scientists have succeeded in making virtual photons real by bouncing the virtual photons off a mirror moving near the speed of light. In this case the mirror is a an electric field.

There is a lesson in this for Architecture; space is never truly empty. It is always filled with the capacity to create and affect. At its heart, this is what Minimalism is about; it is trying to create mirrors to reflect the virtual into actuality. On the flip side, the abstract expressionism of much of the Architecture of the past decade was trying to express the virtual through the actual. It has always been there, but the change in perspective is interesting.

While not the easiest read for those not familiar with the techniques described to study the micro-structural avalanches, it is still an interesting article concerning the nature of material change.

For a number of years I have intrigued by the idea that Architecture can be thought of as purely a material state with all that implies concerning phase changes, fluctuations in bulk intensive qualitative like temperature and the importance of singularities and flaws. This article with its discussion of sudden shifts in the crystalline structure cascading heterogeneously through portions of the material seems like an interesting idea for architectural research.

Fluid dynamics is a tough subject but incredibly interesting and full of fruitful architectural ideas like boundary interfaces, turbulent flows, mixing and phase transitions to name a few. This gallery of images and videos showing various experiments and simulations in fluid dynamic research are show all sorts of interesting phenomenon. Some of my favorites are the Direct Numerical Simulation of Stratified Turbulence, the Bursting Water Balloons, and the Optimal Chaotic Mixing by Two-Dimensional Stokes Flows.

The chaotic mixing seems especially promising as a method of developing a new architecture. For example an architecture developed by casting programmatic volumes into a fluid mixing field and letting them distort and mix, forming overlapping boundaries.

Like the Lytro camera, this camera looks really interesting as it allows one to see the movement of light. There are some physical limitations on the type of scene, but it is amazing the detail that can be shot.

I am still totally fascinated by Lytro cameras which capture the entire light field. Both as a conceptual concept and as practical way to take photos it is just plan cool. I would be incredibly interested in seeing a 3D visualization of the light field, one that can be rotated and navigated through. While it would be possible to get a 3D representation of the physical objects taken in the photo this way, I suspect there is a more interesting model hidden behind that that shows the actual paths of the light.

What are some of the other uses that you all can think of?

Boundaries and interfaces are important concepts in Architectural thought, yet rarely are they thought of in purely material terms of roughness and phase transitions to name just two of many possibilities.

While rocking my son to sleep, I have been catching up on some reading and finely read this interesting article on quantum memory. The basic premise is that scientists have come up with a way to store information geometrically, in this case using a torus. Sound familiar to anyone... sounds like Architecture to me.

Case in point, my finally grad studio was on formalizing knowledge geometrically to create a library. The instructor encouraged us to us topological knots, such as torus's. Though my pursuit ended up exploring cellular automata instead, this article is fascinating as it points a way in which topological knots might actually be used to store knowledge.