recentpopularlog in

kintopp : review   36

Our Search for the Best OCR Tool, and What We Found - Features - Source: An OpenNews project
Heavily redacted documents such as Carter Page’s FISA warrant are notoriously challenging for OCR tools. via Pocket
ocr  review  tools 
may 2019 by kintopp
Evaluating named entity recognition tools for extracting social networks from novels
The analysis of literary works has experienced a surge in computer-assisted processing. To obtain insights into the community structures and social interactions portrayed in novels, the creation of social networks from novels has gained popularity. via Pocket
graphs  literature  nlp  review  social  socialgraph  tools 
may 2019 by kintopp
The Best Python Books – Real Python
Python is an amazing programming language. It can be applied to almost any programming task, allows for rapid development and debugging, and brings the support of what is arguably the most welcoming user community. via Pocket
books  python  review 
march 2019 by kintopp
Digital History und die archivische Fachdiskussion: Ein blinder Fleck? – Digitale Geschichtswissenschaft
Warum wird die nun schon über zwei Jahrzehnte währende intensive, sich in vielen Publikationen niederschlagende Fachdiskussion der Archivarinnen und Archivare (v. a. via Pocket
archives  debates  germany  history  research  review 
march 2019 by kintopp
One Chart, Nine Tools – Revisited · Lisa Charlotte Rost
Tableau Public What can I say - Tableau Public works well for data like this. The embedded graphic is too massive to actually use it in an article, but it’s one of my favorite tool for exploration. via Pocket
review  tools  visualization 
november 2018 by kintopp
Forschungsdaten in der (digitalen) Geschichtswissenschaft. Warum sie wichtig sind und wir gemeinsame Standards brauchen – Digitale Geschichtswissenschaft
Wie in vielen anderen Wissenschaftsbereichen werden auch in der Geschichtswissenschaft die Forschungsdaten eine immer größere Rolle spielen. Sie sind Folge der Digitalisierung und zugleich deren Voraussetzung. via Pocket
germany  history  humanities  infrastructure  research  review 
november 2018 by kintopp
Review of Electronic Enlightenment Scholarly Edition of Correspondence | RIDE
Abstract The Electronic Enlightenment Scholarly Edition of Correspondence (EE), under the directorship of Robert McNamee and made available on a subscription basis by Oxford University Press, is a text collection of over 70,000 individual letters (written between participants of the ‘republic o via Pocket
editions  oxford  review  text 
september 2017 by kintopp
Editing tools. Transcribing and encoding › KNAW Research Portal
This paper deals with editing tools and editing platforms, i.e. programs used by editors in order to fulfil one or more tasks in the creation of a scholarly digital edition (SDE). via Pocket
editing  editions  review  tei  tools 
september 2017 by kintopp
Criteria for Reviewing Digital Text Collections, version 1.0 |
Purpose. This paper provides a framework for the description and evaluation of digital text collections for humanities research as conducted e.g. in literary studies, linguistics, and history. via Pocket
datasets  review  standards  text 
august 2017 by kintopp
Criteria for Reviewing Digital Text Collections, version 1.0 |
Purpose. This paper provides a framework for the description and evaluation of digital text collections for humanities research as conducted e.g. in literary studies, linguistics, and history. via Pocket
datasets  review  standards  text 
february 2017 by kintopp
DSHR's Blog: Rick Whitt on Digital Preservation
Google's Rick Whitt has published (PDF), a very valuable 114-page review of digital preservation aimed at legal and policy audiences. Below the fold, some encomia and some quibbles (but much less than 114 pages of them). Below, I use the page numbers from the original. via Pocket
preservation  report  review 
january 2017 by kintopp
Announcing the Open Review Toolkit
I’m happy to announce the release of the Open Review Toolkit, open source software that enables you to convert your book manuscript into a website that can be used for Open Review. via Pocket
open  access  publishing  review  tools 
december 2016 by kintopp
Criteria for Reviewing Scholarly Digital Editions, version 1.1 |
Patrick Sahle; in collaboration with Georg Vogeler and the members of the IDE; Version 1.1, June 2014 (Version 1.0, September 2012 – January 2014; German version 1.1: http://ift.tt/2g57EFD). Definitions. via Pocket
editing  editions  review  standards 
november 2016 by kintopp
DLF Metadata Assessment Working Group
This is the website for the Digital Library Federation (DLF) Assessment Interest Group (AIG) Metadata Working Group, also known as the DLF Metadata Assessment Working Group. via Pocket
metadata  review  standards 
august 2016 by kintopp
DH 2016 Abstracts
In the ever-expanding world of digital libraries and cultural heritage collections, bibliographic metadata standards provide a structured approach to managing resources. via Pocket
bibliography  metadata  review  standards 
august 2016 by kintopp
Live Peer Review: Mapping Architecture in Germany - Matthew Lincoln, PhD
This post is a response to a call by Paul Jaskot and Ivo van der Graaff at the Center for Advanced Studies in the Visual Arts to review an in-progress dataset for their research project “Historical Journals as Digital Sources: Mapping Architecture in Germany, 1914-1924”. via Pocket
datasets  review 
august 2016 by kintopp
One Chart, Twelve Charting Libraries · Lisa Charlotte Rost
Charting Libraries. Gosh, there are so many out there. On Wikipedia and other websites, one can find a comparison of ca. 50 libraries – and these are only JavaScript libraries; not mentioning languages like Processing and libraries for Python and R. via Pocket
review  visualization  webdev 
june 2016 by kintopp
Digital art history: the American scene
Francesca Rose. What do you consider an inspiring example of digital art history research and scholarship? What are some promising current directions and new trends in digital art history today? Johanna Drucker. via Pocket
arthistory  methodology  review 
april 2016 by kintopp
Tombone's Computer Vision Blog: ICCV 2015: Twenty one hottest research papers
Computer Vision used to be cleanly separated into two schools: geometry and recognition. via Pocket
conference  review 
december 2015 by kintopp
Spatial Humanities: Promise and Peril, double book review by Gwilym Eades | Society and space
David Bodenhamer, John Corrigan, and Trevor Harris Eds, The Spatial Humanities: GIS and the Future of Humanities Scholarship, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 2010. 222 pages. $ 20.99, paperback,  ISBN: 9780253222176 (http://www.iupress.indiana.edu/product_info.php?products_id=287756) via Pocket
books  geo  gis  review 
may 2015 by kintopp
New Roots Oral History IT Development | Latino Migration Project
IT development for the New Roots Oral History project has begun! As part of the process we are reviewing our options for collection management and web publishing software. via Pocket
omeka  review  wordpress 
march 2015 by kintopp
PLOS ONE: Researcher Perspectives on Publication and Peer Review of Data
Data “publication” seeks to appropriate the prestige of authorship in the peer-reviewed literature to reward researchers who create useful and well-documented datasets. The scholarly communication community has embraced data publication as an incentive to document and share data. via Pocket
data  datasets  peer  review  standards 
march 2015 by kintopp
SEHEPUNKTE - Rezension von: Crowdsourcing our Cultural Heritage - Ausgabe 15 (2015), Nr. 1
Mit dem World Wide Web, und insbesondere mit dessen Interaktivitätsmöglichkeiten, wie sie sich seit der Jahrtausendwende unter dem Schlagwort des Web 2.0 entwickeln, haben sich auch neue Formen der "citizen science" etabliert. Gemeint ist die Beteiligung der Laien am wissenschaftlichen Prozess. via Pocket
books  crowdsourcing  review 
february 2015 by kintopp
In evaluating digital humanities, enthusiasm may outpace best practices @insidehighered
Jump to Navigation | Follow us: Get Daily E-mail Sunday, April 22, 2012 Home › News Related Stories Advertisement January 4, 2012 - 3:00am By Steve Kolowich via Pocket
debates  evaluation  methodology  review  tenure 
october 2014 by kintopp
Book Review: Breaking the Page: Transforming Books and the Reading Experience | UX Perspective
In Breaking the Page: Transforming Books and the Reading Experience, Peter Meyers offers a compelling argument for moving beyond the printed page to embrace the potential of the digital book as an intuitive, holistic, and interactive “reading experience. via Pocket
ebooks  publishing  review  ux  books 
august 2014 by kintopp
First call for project statements - DHCommons Journal | DHCommons
The editorial team of centerNet’s new DHCommons journal is thrilled to request submissions for its inaugural issue. We seek mid-stage digital projects who wish peer review and feedback that will contribute to the project’s development. via Pocket
review  journals 
july 2014 by kintopp

Copy this bookmark:





to read